|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Museum of: Rome | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name of the artefact: Marmotta’s Venus | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The so-called Marmotta’s Venus, a female carved stone
figurine, was found by the underwater excavations in the village. It was
placed under the floor of an hut with special features that resembles a
shrine. It’s a figure of Mother Goddess of a type spreading all over
Neolithic Mediterranean Sea and Eastern Europe. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
WHERE IS IT AND MAIN
CHARACTERISTICS |
STATE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department: |
- |
Preservation: |
Very good | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inventory number: |
23058 |
Restauration: |
No restored | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name of the artefact: |
Marmotta’s Venus |
Completeness: |
Complete | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Object type: |
Human figurine |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Material: |
Green Steatite |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Methof of manufacture: |
Polished and carved stone |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decoration
type: |
No decoration |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distinctive mark: |
- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DIMENSIONS |
PERIOD OF USE |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Length (mm): |
- |
Epoque: |
Neolithic |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Heigth
(mm): |
48 |
Culture: |
- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diameter
(mm): |
- |
Period: |
Early Neolithic Period |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Width (mm): |
- |
Face: |
- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thickness (mm): |
22 |
Absolute chronology: |
6800-6100 BP |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Weight
(g): |
22,44 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DISCOVERY |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date: |
2000 |
Country: |
Italy |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
District: |
Lazio |
Town hall affiliation: |
Roma |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Village: |
Anguillara |
Discovery findspot: |
Marmotta |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Condition of discovery: |
Archaeological excavation |
Discovery type: |
Sanctuary |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANALYSES – DETERMINATIONS |
FILLED IN BY |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Type: |
- |
Name: |
Chiara Delpino, Vincenzo Tinè |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Laboratory: |
- |
Institution: |
- |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No./Code: |
- |
Date: |
10-2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
DEEPENINGS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Morphology of the object: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The profile of the figurine’s head is conical shaped
with a convex base: the face –lacking facial features - points upward and
the hair is held at the back of the neck by a hairnet which falls on the
shoulders. The shoulders are straight, the bust is clearly laying
backwards while the back is slightly hunched. The arms are finely carved
with the forearms, thinner and missing the hands which disappear
underneath the large and feeble breasts. The stomach is prominent,
emphasized by lateral marks that end on the statuette’s backside: finely
carved are the belly-button and pubic triangle. The sides, the buttocks
and the thighs are particularly voluminous. The legs are parted by a deep
carved line. A perpendicular line on the legs may represent either the
knees or the feet which end in a pointed feature. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Decoration: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inscription: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Analogies: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The figurine resembles, if not to the detail, some of
the “Venus” in the Early Palaeolithic and Epipaleolithic contexts in
Europe but has also been compared to other female statuettes, made out of
stone, ceramics and bone found in the Balkans, Aegean and Mediterranean
area, dating back to the Middle Neolithic period. The “Venus” from the
Lake of Bracciano can specifically be compared to the “yellow steatite
statuette” recovered in the Late Palaeolithic stratigraphy in the caves of
Balzi Rossi(Liguria). This figurine is similar in dimensions to the one
from “La Marmotta” but coarser in the craftsmanship and in regard to the
anatomical features shows a different female configuration, a less
emphasized obesity. The presence of a deposit with a long stratigraphic
sequence only hundred of metres from the Neolithic village of “La
Marmotta”, deposit in which lithic tools datable back to the Upper
Paleolithic Period have been recovered, may attest the steatite statuette
as preceding the village foundation.It is therefore possible that the
settlers from the Neolithic village of “La Marmotta” had by chance come
across archaeological presence from a previous age from which took some
objects. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interpretation: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The figurine was probably carved to be seen from all
point of views since all sides are finely crafted. It has been suggested
that the “Venus” was located on a half-seated position with the bust
reclining back-wards, as if seated on a kind of chair. Seated or
half-seated depictions of statuettes are not uncommon among the earliest
Neolithic examples from the Near East and Greece. These “Venus” share with
the statuette from “La Marmotta” other characteristics such as the
position of the arms, located under the breast as if holding it up instead
of on the breast as commonly depicted on Palaeolithic statuette examples,
and the conical shape of the face in most cases turn upwards in contrast
to the female images from the Palaeolithic period usually interpreted to
be looking downward. It is also on the base of these details that the
figurine from “La Marmotta” was attributed to the Neolithic Period. The
statuette was recovered within the village, underneath the floor of a
rectangular hut, peculiar because of the typology of ritual items found in
its interior. In the same location in which the figurine had been laid
down, close to a hearth, were also kept fragments of ochre and rare
artefacts such as decorated bones, gemini vessels, impressed and painted
small bowls, which all seem to hold some cult relevance. Because of the
presence of these items it has been suggested that the hut might have been
used for religious practice, some kind of sanctuary. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bibliography: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AA.Vv., 2000, Diosas. Imàgenes femeninas del
Mediterraneo de la preistoria al mundo romando, Museo de Historia de la
Ciudad, Barcelona AA.Vv., 2001, Donne, Uomini e animali. Oggetti di arte e
di culto nella Preistoria. Firenze-Roma. FUGAZZOLA DELPINO M.A., 1996, Un
tuffo nel passato, 8.000 anni fa nel Lago di Bracciano, Soprintendenza
Speciale al Museo Preistorico ed Etnografico “L.Pigorini”, ed.BetaGamma,
Viterbo. FUGAZZOLA DELPINO M.A., 2000, Lo scavo subacqueo di un villaggio
perilacustre del VI millennio a.C., in “Lezioni Fabio Faccenna”.
Conferenze di archeologia subacquea, I-II ciclo, 1998-99. Edipuglia,
pp.13-25 FUGAZZOLA DELPINO M.A., D’EUGENIO G., PESSINA A., 1993, “La
Marmotta”, (Anguillara Sabazia, Rm). Un abitato perilacustre di età
neolitica, in Bullettino di Paletnologia Italiana, 84,, n.s. II pp.181-315
FUGAZZOLA DELPINO M.A., TINÈ V., 2004, Rappresentazioni della Grande Madre
nella preistoria mediterranea, in Il mito e il culto della Grande Madre.
Transiti, Metamorfosi, permanenze, Bologna, 25 novembre 2000 WHITE R.,
BISSON M., 1998, Imagerie féminine du Paléolithique. L’apport des
nouvelles statuettes de Grimaldi, in Gallia Préhistoire, 40, pp.95-132
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||